| Page 20 | |||||
| engineering
for sure. He has no real experience working on aircraft and holds no licenses
or certificates for such. In short, he has no credentials or experience
whatsoever upon which to base a claim to the ability to design, redesign,
or even analyze the design of any part of an aircraft. But, he has read
aircraft MAGAZINES. And he was in this discussion where his acquaintance
who was an engineer for a big time aircraft company said the stabilizer
looked too thick to him. And Ben is smart. He knows he’s smart. He knows
he’s smart enough to figure out how to make something better even if no
one that has actually used it has ever said there was anything wrong with
it. And he knows that if he makes it better that he is going to be able
to stand beside his plane at air shows and say that his plane is better
than all the other planes like it because he recognized how it could be
improved and he improved it.
What Ben doesn’t realize is that even though he may be very intelligent, intelligence is never a substitute for experience and knowledge, also referred to as credentials. Even the best and the brightest engineers, trained specifically in the field in which they are working make horrible mistakes. Not because they aren’t intelligent, but simply because of a lack of experience. Experience is just another word for education. As an example, air bags were under development for 30 years. The auto makers put their best and their brightest engineers to the task of designing a device to save lives. They tested and they tested and they engineered and they engineered and finally, they felt like they had the solution. But until millions of those devices were put into cars in actual use, none of them realized that those airbags could literally decapitate a child sitting in the front seat of a car! Last year 9 children died as the direct result of airbags and 2 of those were |
literally
decapitated! In one of those 2, the car was going less than 9 miles per
hour and the vehicle wasn’t even hurt! That happened in spite of the best
efforts of the best engineers with the best of laboratories and huge amounts
of money to spend. Why would any individual with no experience and no education
in the field presume to redesign any part of something as complex as an
aircraft which is already proven to work well?
I know that for a lot of people it is fun trying to solve problems. Some folks want to solve a problem so bad that like Mr. Curtin, they conjure up a problem where none exists just so they can solve it! But when it comes to aircraft, everyone needs to follow the physician’s creed, First, Do no harm. The FAA won’t allow a non-licensed person to work on a certified aircraft for good reason. So it can’t be changed. INSURANCE
AND THE FAA
|
||||
| GLASS GOOSE GAZETTE * ISSUE #17, June 15, 2000 |
|
||||
|
Copyright 1998-2004 by QuikKit Division of Rainbow Flyers, Inc. All rights reserved: no part of this site may be copied or reproduced. |
|||||